سلام،
این یادداشت دامنه نوشته شد ولی دیروز که به رأی گذاشته نشد. پاراگراف دوم مطلب را کمی روشنتر میکند و همینطور مثال سوم (به نظرم بیش از حد جزئینگر است) ولی همانطور که پیشتر اشاره کردم وقتی تفکیک را از قبل انجام دادهایم چرا چنین پیشنهادی شده است را نمیدانم.
با احترام و سپاس فراوان
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRM 47 Homework:
HW to RS for Friday 26/6/2020 last session, bring back the scope note that we need.
HW:
This property establishes the relationship between an E36 Visual Item and an E55 Type that represents the class of entity which it visually represents. This property is used when the identity of the specific entity being represented is unknown or unidentified beyond the content of the E36 Visual Item. Pxx represents entity of type is, thus, a shortcut of the more fully developed path from the domain E36 Visual Item through P138 represents, E1 Entity, P2 has type, to the range E55 Type.
This property is most useful when there is an entity of any type being depicted that is not identifiable as any single individual, but is clearly of a particular type. The image carried by a photograph of an unknown garden would depict many flowers, but none of which are known as entities beyond the photograph. Conversely, if there isn't an individual that could fill the role of the E1 Entity in the fully developed path, then this property is not appropriate, and a direct relationship of P138 represents from the E36 Visual Item to the E55 Type is recommended.
The manner or mode of the representation can be captured using Pxx.1 mode of representation.
Examples:
The photograph’s visual content (E36) represents an entity of type beach (E55)
The sculpture’s visual content (E36) represents an entity of type woman (E55)
The landscape painting’s image content (E36) represents an entity of type field (E55) in the manner of background (E55)